osprey_archer: (books)
osprey_archer ([personal profile] osprey_archer) wrote2025-06-19 08:08 am

Book Review: The Witch of Clatteringshaws

Joan Aiken’s pacing may have bobbled in some of her later books, but it’s full speed ahead in The Witch of Clatteringshaws, which she raced to get done with the literal deadline of her own encroaching demise.

She has a lot of loose ends to wrap up in this book, chief among them the question of who will be the next King of England. Simon is currently saddled with the job, but he doesn’t want it, because all he wants to do is live a quiet life communing with animals and painting, and also he would like to marry Dido who has very definitively stated that she is unwilling to be queen.

It’s not entirely clear to me if she’d like to marry Simon, but she’s a good bro who doesn’t want to see Simon stuck on the throne, so she heads off to the north to chase up the only lead they’ve got on a possible alternative king. Apparently there’s an Aelfric somewhere up in Caledonia with a claim to the throne?

Spoilers: we never find Aelfric. From beginning to end we have no idea who this man is. Like the thought speech, which was so important in the Is books and never appears again, this one of many loose ends Joan has decided she doesn’t have time to bother with. As she finished this book a scant four months before her death, that’s fair enough.

Instead, Dido finds a Dickensian old person’s home (and let’s pause to admire Aiken’s breadth of Dickensian vision: Dickensian orphanages, Dickensian schools, Dickensian mines, apparently Dickensian mills in Midnight Is a Place which we haven’t read yet, and now Dickensian retirement homes). And at this home there is a boy, an orphan foundling who has been raised as a drudge, even though he arrived at the door wrapped in a cloth emblazoned with a golden crown…

Spoilers )
magid: (Default)
magid ([personal profile] magid) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2025-06-19 07:18 am
Entry tags:

Social Q’s: No Need to Feel Flattened by a Fifth Wheel

Third question in this week’s NY Times’ Social Q’s, posted because I’m flabbergasted by the guests’ question.
Read more... )
walkitout: (Default)
Nella Acceber ([personal profile] walkitout) wrote2025-06-18 10:52 pm

Wednesday is a new schedule for therapy

It was in the morning instead of the evening, so it was a reason to get A. up and out the door. I walked with M. in the afternoon. I had a slightly abbreviated (started 15 minutes late to allow time to get home from therapy) conversation with J. It ended about a half an hour early because we ran out of things to talk about. Because he’s so tired all the time (and yes, I know I’m making excuses for him), he has very limited patience and cognitive capacity for the kinds of conversations I love like, How Does This Thing Work Anyway or How Is Our Society Changing or How Could We Bend the Curve of Our Society in a Better Direction. People like this kind of stuff very occasionally, and they get tired real quick, and aging isn’t helping any of us become more flexible. Priestess is actually getting more capable of it over time, which is an interesting contrast, and A. (both Bay Area A. and my daughter) is also a lot of fun to engage in this kind of thing with.

I’m trying to refocus on getting that kind of stuff written down, either here or elsewhere, rather than inflicting it on people who Just Aren’t That Into It. At first, with J., I was being really careful to make sure he got all the time he needed to talk about whatever he wanted to talk about at the beginning of the conversation. But he was still pretty cranky at intervals and honestly kind of rude. I thought about that for a while, and weighed whether and how to proceed, and I’ve decided to just not, which is more or less the approach I take with my sister as well. It’s working better, altho it is deeply hilarious when there are half-assed efforts made to get me to talk about something. I just deflect. It’s not like they are asking for the kind of thing I want to talk about. I mention whatever is going on in my daily life, and they aren’t necessarily interested in that, either. It does raise a lot of questions in my mind in terms of, what would the ideal conversation be for these conversational “partners”. Presumably they don’t know either?

J. from the builder provided a markup of the cover sheet for the electrical submittal — I had not done that, and it did need to be done. I further marked up what she did, and then it was really hard to get those markups transferred so I wound up taking screenshots. *shudder*

I got a second walk today! First time in a really long time. It was nice, and I’m going to try to do this more often.
ranunculus: (Default)
ranunculus ([personal profile] ranunculus) wrote2025-06-18 06:14 pm
Entry tags:

Water

It is summer so there is water news.   Cody put the cows in the pasture around the house about a week and a half ago.  For the first few days they didn't come up to the house at all, and instead got their water out of the stream, which is still running. Two good water years in a row have filled up all the aquifers.  A few days ago cows started hiking up the hill to the house and drinking out of the trough.  A herd of thirsty cows can drink a lot of water, and I always begin to get nervous about the system.  It seemed like a pretty sure thing that the springs would need a good cleanup -- and they did.  I haven't even been up to the springs for at least a year. They are about a mile up the road from the house, on the terribly steep slopes of a canyon.  There is a drive up the hill and then a walk along a trail cut into a really, really steep slope and a scramble up a slope that it is easy just to slide back down.   
The "good" spring was dribbling a tiny trickle into the cistern.  This was unsurprising since it regularly gets buried in mud and gravel. The cistern is a section of concrete pipe set upright in the ground.  It has holes drilled in the sides to let the water in. A plastic pipe pokes into the side low down to carry the water down the hill.  To work properly the outside walls of the cistern need to be cleared so the water can flow into the holes.  I undid the plastic pipe joint below the spring so mud wouldn't flow down the pipes and into our tanks. There was about 3 inches of fine mud to remove from inside the cistern, and lots of mud and gravel to dig out around it. My tools were: an old aluminum spatula that I think was meant for ice cream; and a tiny sauce pan which is ideal for scooping up mud and throwing it downhill.  Eventually water began pouring in at a brisk clip.  The next cleanouts were three tiny seeps  just to the right of the "good" spring.  They were flowing well too.   With those finished I scrambled up the terribly steep slope to the 2nd best spring.  Last year it never was cleaned.  This year a clog had formed in the pipe and the whole cistern was full of water.  My t-shirt got wet as I reached in and groped around for the plastic pipe. It was under more than 2 feet of water.  Again I took the pipe apart at a joint a few feet below the spring, so any material blocking the pipe wouldn't  block things up further down.  Suddenly a great jet of water shot out and the cistern quickly drained.  Once the mud had settled, the pipes went back together and I had quite a flow of water.  I was happy with the outcome, though I might go back up in a week or so to see how things are holding. 
The hill up to tanks where water is stored is really, really steep, just like the canyon walls.  Made it all the way up without stopping, and found we had 1/3 of a "tank" of water.  Actually the water was up to the 1/3 mark on all three of the active tanks.  3 1/2 hours later we had gained 8" of water in the tanks. That is a lot. By tomorrow they should be full.   
adrian_turtle: (Default)
adrian_turtle ([personal profile] adrian_turtle) wrote2025-06-18 01:09 pm

focus

I have bifocals now. After more than 10 years of changing back and forth between reading glasses and distance glasses, I have to learn a whole different set of reflexes for looking at things. When to move my eyes. When to move my head and NOT my eyes.

I was fine with carrying reading glasses with me, even though it meant I couldn't just go out with what fit in my pockets. But it's tricky to change glasses while wearing an N95 mask and a broad-brimmed hat, especially when I don't have a table or even a lap where I can put down the pair I'm taking off. So I spent a lot of time in the wrong glasses. Unable to read the bus schedule on my phone or unable to see the bus stop sign telling me which direction the bus is going. Unable to find my way into the supermarket, or unable to read package labels. I appreciate how labels are color-coded and otherwise designed for the convenience of people who cannot read! But it's frustrating how often I bought the wrong thing, or had to ask for help.

Adjusting is ... not great
I woke up with a migraine 5 days in a row.
I stumbled and fell on a trolley platform yesterday. I very nearly fell off the trolley platform, so it was much more upsetting than it might be. I wasn't really hurt, but it was scary. It wasn't even one of the transit stops where the footing is particularly bad.

But the bifocals are great! They're great in the ways I had thought they would be. Even better, because my old distance prescription wasn't right. I can read my phone and read the labels on groceries and also see street signs. I can even see leaves in trees!

The problem is that I don't know how to look where I'm going, literally. When I wore plain distance glasses, my eyes were often aimed at the ground I was about to walk on. Especially when I was walking on rough ground, and most of the pavement in this neighborhood counts as rough ground. The line of the bifocals hides that "3 steps away" ground, and the "next step" ground I can see through the reading window feels harder to focus on than when I just walked around in reading glasses. Is this a solved problem? I presume some of you wear bifocals and look where you're going...do you tuck your chins or something?
ranunculus: (Default)
ranunculus ([personal profile] ranunculus) wrote2025-06-18 01:18 pm

Firefly, M

Yesterday morning Firefly and I went for our first real trail ride together.  Carrie  came over on Juno and we rode up the driveway, down Woodcutter's Ridge and then came back the same way.  On the way out Firefly was full of energy and wanted to either walk really fast or trot.  We walked, taking the lead on the trail.  On the way back Firefly was suddenly not so enthusiastic and strolled along.  Very like her, she loves getting out and always wants to do more.  It was a good ride.  Yes she is still pretty green and needs to learn a lot, but she never really put up a fuss. 

In the afternoon M flew in from Alaska. On the way to Santa Rosa to get him I dropped off the pole saw, which is very broken.  It will get a complete tuneup and a quick look at the leaking chain oil chamber.  I also took one of the weed whackers down.  Darren fixed it on the spot, replacing a bent pin that was preventing the knob that selects for Off-Start-Run from working.  The machine also got a new plastic casing, as one part was destroyed.  While chatting with Darren I learned: fuel mix (the oily fluid I mix with gasoline to make two cycle fuel) does not go bad. Yes, I can use that container of fuel mix that is several years old.  Also learned that why one should keep a chain really sharp.  Dull chains drag through the wood heating up both the chainsaw bar and the motor. A sufficiently hot motor warps everything inside it and stops working.   Good sharp chains not only keep the saw cool, but they cut a heck of a lot faster.  I'm SLOWLY learning to hand sharpen chains in a reasonable length of time. 

Chena is very, very glad to have M back.  He plays with her all the time.  I'm happy to have him here too. 
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-06-18 02:25 pm
Entry tags:

Bundle of Horror: Raven



Raven: A Gothic Horror RPG – the core rulebook, scenarios, & GM Screen in both English and Spanish versions!

Bundle of Horror: Raven
oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)
oursin ([personal profile] oursin) wrote2025-06-18 04:00 pm

Wednesday had an online meeting about reviving a project they began decades ago

What I read

Finished Wide is the Gate, and while things are getting grimmer and grimmer as regards The World Situation, I am still very much there for Our Protag Lanny being a mild-mannered art dealer with a secret identity as anti-fascist activist, who gets on with everybody and is quite the antithesis of the Two-Fisted Hollywood Hero. (I was thinking who would I cast in the role and while there's a touch of the Jimmy Stewarts, the social aplomb and little moustache - William Powell?)

Lates Literary Review.

Mary Gordon, The Chase of the Wild Goose: The Story of Lady Eleanor Butler and Miss Sarah Ponsonby, Known as the Ladies of Llangollen (1936), which is sort-of a classic version of their story recently republished. But o dear, it does one of my pet hates, which is blurring 'imaginative recreation' with 'biographical research' and skipping between the two modes, and then in the final chapter she encounters the ghosts of of the Ladies, I can't even, really. Plus, Gordon, who was b. 1861, obtained medical education, fought for suffrage, etc, nevertheless disses on Victorian women as 'various kinds of imbecile', unlike those robust and politically-engaged ladies of the Georgian era. WOT. TUT. Also honking class issues about how the Ladies were Ladies and always behaved accordingly.

Began Robert Rodi, What They Did to Princess Paragon (1994), which was just not doing it for me, I can be doing with viewpoint characters being Not Nice, but I was beginning to find both of them (the comic-book writer and the fanboy) tedious.

Also not doing it for me, Barbara Vine, The Child's Child (2012): sorry, the inset novel did not read to me like a real novel of the period at which it was supposed to have been writ as opposed to A Historical Novel of Those Oppressive Times of the early C20th. Also, in frame narrative, I know PhD student who is writing thesis on unwed mothers in literature is doing EngLit but I do think someone might have mentioned (given period at which she is supposed to be doing this) the historiography on The Foundling Hospital.

I then turned to Shirley Jackson, We Have Always Lived in the Castle (1962), which it is a very long time since I read.

Then I was reduced to Agatha Christie, By the Pricking of My Thumbs (1968), and Murder in the Mews (1937).

On the go

I happened to spot my copy of Margery Sharp, Cluny Brown (1944), which I know I was looking for a while ago, and am reading that though it looks as though I re-read it more recently than I thought.

Have also begun on Books For Review.

Up Next

Really dunno.

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-06-18 10:16 am
Entry tags:

Counting the Days: Five SFF Approaches to Calendars



So many different ways of measuring history and the passage of time...

Counting the Days: Five SFF Approaches to Calendars
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-06-18 09:04 am

Magus of the Library, volume 8 by Mitsu Izumi



For what purpose has someone summoned a ten-story-tall mountain spirit to Aftzaak, City of Books?

Magus of the Library, volume 8 by Mitsu Izumi
minoanmiss: Minoan lady scribe holding up a recursive scroll (Scribe)
minoanmiss ([personal profile] minoanmiss) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2025-06-18 08:49 am
osprey_archer: (books)
osprey_archer ([personal profile] osprey_archer) wrote2025-06-18 08:17 am

Wednesday Reading Meme

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Lo these many years ago, after my grandma died, I helped sort out her bookshelves, which held books all the way back from her book-loving aunts and uncles in the early 1900s. As I was at the time in a graduate program, staring down a Ph.D. thesis set roughly in that era, I took a few books that seemed representative, including George Barr McCutcheon’s The Alternative, as McCutcheon was a famous Hoosier humorist of the time period.

So was Booth Tarkington, whose work is still very funny, so I approached McCutcheon’s book with high hopes. However, this is perhaps not the place to start with McCutcheon, as it’s a bit of weightless romantic Christmas fluff that barely cracks one hundred pages despite largish type and beautiful green leafy borders around each page.

Beautifully printed, though. I might keep it just as a lovely example of the printer’s trade.

I’m not usually a bit audiobook person, but when [personal profile] troisoiseaux told me that Michael Schur (showrunner for, among other things, The Good Place) read his own audiobook WITH THE CAST OF THE GOOD PLACE, of course I had to listen to it. A fun romp through the history of moral philosophy, focusing most heavily on Aristotelian virtue ethics, utilitarianism, and Kant.

Schur is good at amusing descriptions of different moral approaches to problems, but less strong when he wanders off the beaten path to discuss, say, what moral philosophy has to say about engaging with the art of terrible people (or chicken sandwiches made by chicken sandwich companies with politics you abhor, etc.). He ultimately comes down on the side of “I guess you gotta decide for yourself,” which isn’t really guidance, especially after he’s just run through why he thinks virtue ethics, utilitarianism, and Kant’s Categorical Imperative suggest that you should give up that literal or metaphorical chicken sandwich. Have some guts, man! Either stand by your moral reasoning, or offer a counterargument why actually it’s FINE if we all chow down on some Chik-Fil-A.

What I’m Reading Now

Padraic Colum’s The Big Tree of Bunlahy: Stories of My Own Countryside. Colum won a couple of other Newbery Honors, both of which I felt were dry and dull, but apparently all Colum needed was the inspiration of writing about his very own corner of Ireland to blossom into a fascinating storyteller. I’m doling the book out one tale a night and it’s still going to end far too soon.

What I Plan to Read Next

Evelina has arrived!
sovay: (Viktor & Mordecai)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2025-06-18 07:29 am
Entry tags:

Why don't you ever let me love you?

Allison Bunce's Ladies (2024) so beautifully photosets the crystalline haze of a sexual awakening that the thought experiment assigned by its writer-director-editor seems more extraneous than essential to its sensorily soaked seventeen-minute weekend, except for the queerness of keeping its possibilities fluid. The tagline indicates a choice, but the film itself offers something more liminal. Whatever its objectivity, what it tells the heroine is real.

It's more than irony that this blurred epiphany occurs in the none more hetero setting of a bachelorette weekend, whose all-girl rituals of cheese plates and orange wine on the patio and drunkenly endless karaoke in a rustically open-plan rental somewhere down the central coast of California are so relentlessly guy-oriented, the Bechdel–Wallace test would have booked it back up 101 after Viagra entered the chat. The goofiest, freakiest manifestation of the insistence on men are the selfie masks of the groom's face with which the bride's friends are supposed to pose as she shows off her veil in the lavender overcast of the driftwood-littered beach, but it's no less telling that as the conversation circles chronically around partners past and present, it's dudes all the way down. Even jokily, their twentysomething, swipe-right femininity admits nothing of women who love women, which leaves almost literally unspeakable the current between ginger-tousled, disenchanted Ruby (Jenna Lampe) and her lankier, longtime BFF Leila (Greer Cohen), the outsiders of this little party otherwise composed of blonde-bobbed Chloe (Ally Davis) and her flanking mini-posse of Grace (Erica Mae McNeal) and Lex (Tiara Cosme Ruiz), always ready to reassure their wannabe queen bee that she's not a bad person for marrying a landlord. "That's his passion!" They are not lovers, these friends who drove down together in Ruby's SUV. Leila has a boyfriend of three months whose lingering kiss at the door occasioned an impatiently eye-rolling horn-blare from Ruby, herself currently single after the latest in a glum history of heterosexual strike-outs: "No, seriously, like every man subconsciously stops being attracted to me as soon as I tell him that I don't want to have kids." And yet the potential thrums through their interactions, from the informality of unpacking a suitcase onto an already occupied bed to the nighttime routine of brushing their teeth side by side, one skimming her phone in bed as the other emerges from the shower and unselfconsciously drops her towel for a sleep shirt, climbing in beside her with such casual intimacy that it looks from one angle like the innocence of no chance of attraction, from another like the ease of a couple even longer established than the incoming wedding's three years. "He's just threatened by you," Leila calms the acknowledgement of antipathy between her boyfriend and her best friend. It gets a knowing little ripple of reaction from the rest of the group, but even as she explains for their tell-all curiosity, she's smiling over at her friend at the other end of the sofa, an unsarcastic united front, "Probably because he knows I love her more than him."

Given that the viewer is encouraged to stake out a position on the sex scene, it does make the most sense to me as a dream, albeit the kind that reads like a direct memo from a subconscious that has given up waiting for dawn to break over Marblehead. It's gorgeous, oblique, a showcase for the 16 mm photography of Ryan Bradford at its most delicately saturated, the leaf-flicker of sun through the wooden blinds, the rumpling of a hand under a tie-dyed shirt, a shallow-breasted kiss, a bunching of sheets, all dreamily desynched and yet precisely tactile as a fingernail crossing a navel ring: "Tell me if you want me to move my hand." Ruby's lashes lie as closed against her cheeks as her head on the pillow throughout. No wonder she looks woozy the next morning, drinking a glass of water straight from the tap as if trying to cool down from skin-buzzing incubus sex, the edge-of-waking fantasy of being done exactly as she dreamt without having to ask. "Spread your legs, then." Scrolling through their sunset selfie session, she zooms and lingers on the two of them, awkwardly voguing back to back for the camera. She stares wordlessly at Leila across the breakfast table, ἀλλ’ ἄκαν μὲν γλῶσσα ἔαγε λέπτον δ’ αὔτικα χρῶι πῦρ ὐπαδεδρόμηκεν to the life. Chloe is rhapsodizing about her Hallmark romance, but Ruby is speaking to her newly sensitized desires: "I just really hate that narrative, though. Pretending that you don't want something in the hopes that you'll get the thing that you're pretending that you don't want? Like, it just doesn't make any sense." It is just not credible to me that Leila who made such a point of honesty in relationships would pretend that nothing had happened when she checks in on her spaced-out friend with quizzical concern, snuggles right back into that same bed for an affectionate half-argument about her landlord potential. "I'm sure there are dishwasher catalogues still being produced somewhere in the world." Still, as if something of the dream had seeped out Schrödinger's between them, we remember that it was Leila who winkled her way into an embrace of the normally standoffish Ruby, who had her arms wrapped around her friend as she delivered what sure sounded like a queerplatonic proposal: "Look, if we both end up single because we both don't want kids, at least we'll have each other. We can have our own wedding." The last shots of the film find them almost in abstract, eyes meeting in the rear view mirror, elbows resting on the center console as the telephone poles and the blue-scaled Pacific flick by. It promises nothing and feels like a possibility. Perhaps it was not only Ruby's dream.

I can't know for certain, of course, and it seems to matter to the filmmaker that I should not know, but even if all that has changed is Ruby's own awareness, it's worth devoting this immersive hangout of a short film to. The meditative score by Karsten Osterby sounds at once chill and expectant, at times almost drowning the dialogue as if zoning the audience out into Ruby. The visible grain and occasional flaw in the film keep it haptically grounded, a memento of Polaroids instead of digitally-filtered socials. For every philosophizing moment like "Do you ever have those dreams where you wake up and you go about your day and get ready and everything feels normal, but then you wake up and you're still in bed, so you're like, 'Oh, was I sleeping or was that real?'" there's the ouchily familiar beat where Ruby and Leila realize simultaneously that neither of them knows the name of Chloe's fiancé, just the fact that he's a landlord. Whatever, it's an exquisite counterweight to heteronormativity, a leaf-light of queerness at the most marital-industrial of times. I found it on Vimeo and it's on YouTube, too. This catalogue brought to you by my single backers at Patreon.
spiralsheep: Sheep wearing an eyepatch (Default)
Humph ([personal profile] spiralsheep) wrote2025-06-18 11:27 am

Aurora Australis readalong 9 / 10, Life under Difficulties

Aurora Australis readalong 9 / 10, Life under Difficulties by James Murray, post for comment, reaction, discussion, fanworks, links, and whatever obliquely related matters your heart desires. You can join the readalong at any time or skip sections or go back to earlier posts. It's all good. :-)

Text of Life under Difficulties by James Murray:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Aurora_Australis/Life_under_Difficulties

The "plate" illustrations mentioned can be found in Murray's scientific paper on this research:
https://www.quekett.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/murray-antarctic-rotifera.pdf

Note that this is a scientific essay about extremophile organisms, using Rotifers as the main example, and some of the science is out of date.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotifer
Also mentioned, "Water Bears":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tardigrade
General: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremophile

Reminder for next week, the dream fantasy Bathybia by Douglas Mawson:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Aurora_Australis/Bathybia

Readalong intro and reaction post links:
https://spiralsheep.dreamwidth.org/662515.html
mildred_of_midgard: Johanna Mason head shot (Johanna)
mildred_of_midgard ([personal profile] mildred_of_midgard) wrote2025-06-18 04:04 am
Entry tags:

Adventures in (back of) knee pain

Well, I guess I will *not* be going for a bunch of 20+ mile walks this week, as I managed to badly overstretch a muscle and spent Sunday and Monday confined to bed.

Not sure if it was from the 15-mile Friday walk, the .5 mile Saturday run, or the attempt to try a new stretch for my glutes, but it's hard to be an aspiring ultrarunner if you can't run .5 miles without ending up bedridden for days on end!

The full saga in all its gory detail, copy-pasted from WhatsApp. Inside jokes abound, read at your own risk (of confusion).

Woe! Woe was me. )
troisoiseaux: (reading 3)
troisoiseaux ([personal profile] troisoiseaux) wrote2025-06-17 11:42 pm
Entry tags:

Recent reading

Read Stories I Tell Myself by Juan F. Thompson, his memoir about growing up as the son of writer Hunter S. Thompson. This was obviously interesting to read after seeing The Untitled Unauthorized Hunter S. Thompson Musical, but what really struck me is how Thompson wrote about his volatile childhood, and the relationship he built with his father over the years, through a lens of being both his father's son and a father himself.

Started reading Murderland: Crime and Bloodlust in the Time of Serial Killers by Caroline Fraser (whose biography of Laura Ingalls Wilder I read a few years back) and I'm curious to see where she's going with this, because there seem to be a couple of main threads emerging: her central argument appears to be that the reason the Pacific Northwest had so many serial killers in the 70s-80s was childhood exposure to lead poisoning and other toxins, but she's also writing a lot about the other ways the PNW can kill you - so far, poor bridge construction and earthquakes - and has started to weave in references to her own childhood on Mercer Island, near Seattle.

For a completely different vibe, I've been re-reading In Defiance of All Geometry and World Ain't Ready by idiopathicsmile, because I rewatched the Les Mis 25th Anniversary Concert and was immediately slammed with teenage fandom nostalgia. It occurs to me that the appeal of both idiopathicsmile's fics (+ the Les Mis fandom on Tumblr circa 2013-15 in general, really) and my favorite actual published YA in high school (Maggie Stiefvater's Raven Cycle) was the premise of having a close-knit group of friends who are deeply passionate about something (social justice! quest for a magical dead Welsh king!) and all a little bit in love with each other. I also discovered from a friend with an AO3 account that our mutual favorite author of canon-era Les Mis fic did not delete her fics, just made them private, so after a decade+ of lurking I finally signed up for an AO3 account, or rather for an invitation(?) to make one, which I will hopefully receive... some time next week?